Project is currently 8.7% complete.

 
  • The Home
  • The News
  • The History
  • The Research
  • The Expense Report
  • The Information Page
             -Those Involved
                   -Dane P. McDougall
                   -David M. Patierno
             -Information for Idiots
  • The Forum
  • The Contact Page


  • Partners:

    For more detailed information on the research process and its discoveries, see these detailed descriptions:

  • Rivet Reasearch
  • Toaster Tech

    Saturday, the 12th of April
    Finally, after more than 8 months after The Underwater Mouse Project began, we have submerged a vessel in a pool. The famous Test Module 20 (photo) was recently fully enclosed and sunk to a maximum depth of 9 ft below the water surface. No leaking occurrded while underwater, however interesting events took place after it was surfaced. You can watch the video of it here.


    Saturday, the 1st of February
    Alarming events took place this evening as a tenative water detection system was tested. Although the system worked quite well and was only triggered when water was present, it had minor deterioration effects on the silicon. After running the system for a while, one corner of the test module began to leak. Further research will be conducted to determine exactly why this happens.


    Sunday, the 29th of December
    A theoretical weight of water has been determinded today, 8.345404452 pounds per US gallon (assuming that there are 3785.411784000 cm³ in a gallon). Although I will probably never test or double check it, this will be the number used to make all calculations on the vessel. After using 8.5 lbs./gal. in 'Model A's calculations, I feel confident that with this new accuracy the project will be more effective.


    Saturday, the 19th of October
    A preliminary testing phase was started today. It involved the caulking that was recently added. The results were sub-par as it eventually began to leak (photo) after a short period of time. Later, after reading the directions on the caulking tube, it was understood that this product was never intended to be used underwater. I currently have lost all interest in caulking at this time as it is not only inefficient, but also messy and difficult to apply neatly. The next step is to find a suitable alternative.


     

  •